Toxic Baby Food Attorney

Toxic Baby Food Attorney

In federal court cases, courts use a process called Daubert to determine if the science is strong enough to proceed to trial. Both are named after court cases that set federal and California standards for whether the science presented by the experts is sufficient. If toxic baby food lawyers get past this hurdle, that could compel baby food makers to work harder to get rid of toxic heavy metals in their products… and offer reasonable settlement amounts for the pending toxic baby food lawsuits. The 50-page complaint in Lawrence sets forth the full story behind the discovery of toxic levels of heavy metals in baby foods, starting with the HBBF call to action to the subsequent congressional investigation. The complaint lays out a detailed statement of the scientific causation evidence regarding the link between autism and exposure to lead, arsenic, mercury, and other heavy metals during early childhood development. Hundreds, possibly thousands more baby food autism lawsuits claiming a link between heavy metals and autism will likely be filed in the coming months.
Please use the form below to contact our law firm for a free case review. In October 2021, a Congressional Subcommitteereportconfirmed that many popular baby foods contained dangerously high levels of toxic metals — but manufacturers did not issue recalls. Carter Law Group’sautism lawyersare investigating toxic baby food lawsuits. Shortly after the Congressional committee report came out, the New York attorney general Letitia James petitioned the FDA to set standards for all baby food, not just rice cereal, which was the only item that had a toxic metal safety standard at the time. Specifically, the FDA set an action level of 100 parts of inorganic arsenic per billion in infant rice cereal. Congressional Subcommittee reported that numerous popular baby food products, including infant rice cereal, teething biscuits, purees, rice cakes, and others, contain “dangerously high levels” of arsenic, mercury, lead, and cadmium.



She says it’s hard watching Noah struggle, but sprinkled among the tough days, there are good ones. Environmental Defense Fund found that there were measurable levels of lead in 20% of the baby products that were tested. Once you’ve taken care of your child’s injuries and gathered relevant evidence, it’s time to start seeking legal aid and hire an experienced baby food contamination lawyer. Arsenic was present in the baby foods of all four responding companies. Exposure to heavy metals during infancy can, according to the World Health Organization, lead to “untreatable and frequently permanent” brain damage.
Many parents had not been aware of the presence of neurotoxins in baby food until recently. For this reason, if a parent fed their baby some of these products and the child later developed a disorder on the  autism spectrum, they have the right to file a claim for compensation. New York Attorney General Letitia James has led a coalition of several state attorneys general calling on the FDA to speed up the plan’s timeline. James called the delay on lead action levels for baby foods "both a public health concern and a matter of environmental justice," noting how low-income children and children of color are disproportionately impacted by lead. Foods with the highest levels of inorganic arsenic noted in the report were foods babies and children eat, including crisped rice cereal, baby food rice cereal, puffed snacks, white rice, and baby food mixed multi-grain cereal.

As the study explained, however, many of these type of puff snacks contain mostly rice flour, which has large trace amounts of arsenic. Instead of rice-flour-based snacks, offer your babe rice-free options like bananas or yogurt. The future of these products is still uncertain, but government leaders are looking to the Food and Drug Administration for further action, explanation, and direction as to where to go from here.
The plaintiffs and defendants will each choose four cases from the group of 12, and then the court will randomly select the final four cases. In light of everything that’s on the line, you’re best off consulting a lawyer when you need to find out how long you have to file a Neocate lawsuit. These product liability cases are very complex, and it can take years and painstaking work to resolve the most challenging cases.
In our survey, 39 percent of parents who purchased packaged foods sometimes bought organic food for their children, and they cited avoiding lead, arsenic, and other heavy metals as their primary reason for doing it. Our survey also suggests that parents are often unaware of the potential risks of heavy metals in their kids’ food. About half, for example, believed that children’s foods are subject to more strict regulation and safety testing procedures than other packaged foods. Gerber rice cereal was found to exceed the 100 ppb guidance by the FDA in testing in Alaska.

Modeled after breast milk, Similac and Enfamil are advertised as providing complete nutrition to premature babies. According to product manufacturers–Abbott Laboratories and Mead Johnson and Company– these baby formulas support weight gain, bone growth, and better eye and brain development. Filed in Clark County District Court late Tuesday, the lawsuit alleges that Beech-Nut Nutrition Inc., Hain Celestial Group Inc., Gerber Products Co. Inc. and Nurture, Inc. all sell baby food that contains high levels of arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury.
Because babies are less able to process heavy metals than adults, these metals can stay in their systems and cause developmental problems. In particular, exposure to heavy metals may be linked to Autism Spectrum Disorder gerber baby food lawsuit and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. While the precise cause of autism is still debated, researchers have found evidence that exposure to toxic heavy metals can play a role in developing autism.

Perchlorate disrupts thyroid function and blocks the uptake of iodine to the thyroid. When this happens in utero or in early childhood, IQ loss and development issues become very possible. Last year, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a statement that food additives like perchlorate were dangerous to children and should not be approved by the FDA. These results show a prevalence of perchlorate in baby food and underline the need for the FDA to ban all food uses of perchlorate in baby food. Babies are already getting heavy metals in their baby food, perchlorate isn’t a helpful chemical in terms of neurodevelopment for American children.
Susan Goldhaber, M.P.H., is an environmental toxicologist with over 40 years’ experience working at Federal and State agencies and in the private sector, emphasizing issues concerning chemicals in drinking water, air, and hazardous waste. Her current focus is on translating scientific data into usable information for the public. Out of the 37 studies on lead exposure, 19 (51.3%) reported a positive association.

People can be exposed to PFAS in a variety of ways, including by drinking contaminated water and eating food that's either grown near places that use PFAS or packaged in material that contains them. The lawsuit alleges that Thinx uses PFAS chemicals to "enhance the performance of the underwear, including, but not limited to, its 'moisture-wicking' and 'leak-resisting' qualities." "When consumers demand transparency related to these issues, I think that businesses have no choice but to listen," Ruben added. "And so it's my hope that as consumers become more aware of the chemicals that are present in the products that they use every day, that they use their voice to let businesses know that it's not something that they want." Thinx will also take steps to ensure that PFAS are not intentionally added to its underwear at any stage of production and adjust some of its marketing language, including disclosing the use of antimicrobial treatments. It will also continue to have suppliers of raw materials sign a code of conduct and agreement attesting that PFAS are not being intentionally added to Thinx underwear.
The industry continued to act in flagrant violation of consumer safety, potentially causing harm to millions of children, including many in Arkansas. A powerful industry, domestic sales of commercial baby food will exceed $6 billion this year. OAG’s lawsuit seeks to compel Beech-Nut to stop misrepresenting its products and pay civil penalties. This lawsuit follows a congressional investigation into the baby food industry’s safety practices.
For the HBBF report, the scientists tested 168 foods consumed by babies and toddlers from brands including Gerber, Earth's Best, Beech-Nut baby food, and popular store brands. The Nevada group claims the companies are selling baby food that contains high levels of arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury. House of Representatives committee launched a congressional investigation. Test results and company documents were requested from major baby food manufacturers named in the report and several companies complied. The committee’s report, “Baby Foods Are Tainted with Dangerous Levels of Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury,” was released on February 4, 2021. According to a study published in the journal Nature Communications in 2017, the National Institute of Health suggests early-life exposure to heavy metals such as lead may have a direct impact on the risk of a child being diagnosed with autism.